Boss Capital Review - BinaryOptionsAustralia.com

Binary Options Evolutions Boss Capital Review

submitted by CanadaBinary to optionstrading [link] [comments]

A lengthy response to essenceofthought's video: "ContraPoints Is Making The Left More Toxic, Not Less - A Non-Binary Conclusion" -- PART 1

note that this is so big I will probably end up editing it just to fix mistakes in using reddit's markdown. I can only beg your trust that I'm not doing anything shady.

Tardyness

This is about the fourth time I've tried to get through this video. Formally I've only watched less than 9 minutes. First, because I really disliked how much I had to say about that much alone. I didn't like a punch in the gut I felt. Second, I felt I had to get through a real review of Natalie's Cancelling. Third, an uproarious thread on breadtube about Graham Linehan aka glinner threatening to sue EoT over his video exposing glinner for wanting to eradicate trans children. I finally got through all that Sunday night, and now I have chance to start this review.

Title (and thesis?) of EoT's video

ContraPoints Is Making The Left More Toxic, Not Less - A Non-Binary Conclusion
Pure reaction: Hard no, says I. Paying attention to the controversy surrounding Vaush, and the fact that Lily Orchard has a following, PigPuncher's shitty video on EoT themselves, and the self-hating army of Blaire White who like to inject themselves into all other trans people's business, I just cannot say there's anything Natalie has done that's special. This sphere of left-twitter and left-tube would be inundated with the same nastiness whether Opulence happened or not.

The Road Bump

The following between the lines is largely copied from my Cancelling review.
First, EoT says that Natalie is only talking about post-Opulence backlash, and thus accuses her of lying about a timeline on some tweets. They're just wrong.
Second, EoT says "Natalie has a fragile ego."
In the very least, this line is hack. Everybody's ego is fragile. That's freshment psychology 101, it's how egos are, it's a feature. It's just saying somebody is being too fragile, and that's an attack on character.
Second, it's fucking mean. It's mean in a general sense. And it's mean in a more personal sense, and I'll tell you why.
I'll mention this later, but I was what I call a first-generation youtube skeptic/atheist. Youtube was founded in 2006, and by 2008, peaking around 2010, we had a thriving group of what the media would call "New Atheists" on youtube. I can drop you a huge list of names, and it's still at most 20% of what was out there. I never made a single video, though I did have a webcam for a short while and regularly hanged out in Stickam with a dozen members of the Rational Response Squad. At first I fell for Pat Condell's shit. I was a big fan of Thunderf00t until his feud with DawahFilms. I apologize to the world. Sincerely. Look, what I want you to take from this is that I've come to be seen as redeemed by many feminists on reddit and beyond, and I think that Natalie is even more redeemable than I. I'm not trying to be a hater. This is constructive criticism.
But also back then, there was Natalie. Under a different channel whose title contains her deadname. I've linked to three different videos on parasocial relationships. Lemme tell you, I've been through 'em. Some that have had intense influence on my daily life, many others not so much. Natalie was, until she started Contrapoints, somewhere in the middle.
From what I've seen over the last 10 years, Natalie has every reason to be sensitive. Fragile, even. I've seen Natalie make meatspace friends with a few of these fellow atheist/skeptics, and they traveled and dined and chilled with one another. They even pulled a couple New Atheist stunts that backfired. Even contributed to a musical collab, which is still funny.
I've seen the community fragment and bubble and burst and burn and mutate. Basically I've watched Natalie lose friends and get hurt, as with many others. And with 10 years of experience, I can look back at old videos where Natalie's old self can be found, and see the unhappiness that she's described.
EssenceOfThought pulling the "fragile ego" line is frankly toxic. EoT only has 2 years of very hard work to look at, and 2 years of public transformation and transition. And EoT seems to assume that the quality of work a youtuber puts out is porportional to how head-above-water they are when it comes to stress levels and strength of will, and wealth of support. And that's wrong.
It's callous. You can't just assume things about people's accumulated life trauma. Calling people fragile as an insult, I've come to find, is morally wrong, because it calls that we celebrate stoic strength as a virtue. And it's always punching down. Every time it's punching down. Looking at somebody who's feeling vulnerable, and going "gross, you're vulnerable!" And EoT has done this despite listening to Natalie talking about a lack of friends in the world. I can't actually name many meatspace acquaintences of hers, much less good friends, besides {Theryn, Olly, Lindsay Ellis, Jenny Nicholson, other people in the few photos with Lindsay and Jenny maybe, Riley and Fiona, Chelsea Manning, Dan Olson, innuendostudios, hbomb...}. Can you? And how long distance most of those are! Almost all of them are expensive-distance. It sucks.
I stopped watching EoT's third video shortly after 8 minutes when they said that, becuase I was just disgusted. And as I said in Chrisiousity's comment section, it looks like a sign to me that in EoT's focus on Natalie the past month, Natalie has evolved in their mind from a popular creator with a specific and powerfully effective flaw, to an outright Adversary, capital-A included. And that's sad. It's the wrong way to go. In early drafts, I refrenced the first two videos because there's a lot of good points made in them. But EoT grows more combative over time and by the third video steps out of line.
Finally realizing what a down-punch the "fragile ego" schtick is, and coming to hate it, just might be the last vestige of being a first-generation youtube atheist/skeptic fan leaving me. I've upvoted this behavior a ton in the past, but I plan to never support it again in the way it's happened here. It's one thing to criticize a political party for being toadies to a man with an actual stereotyped fragile ego, because that's dangerous. It's another to say it to declare a hurt person's vulnerability a crime.
Whatmore, the accusation coudl just as well fit the people he speaks about in the beginning of the video, who lock down their twitter accounts at the mere knowledge that Cancelling was published. Does it just not occur to EoT that Natalie flinches and dodges certain kinds of attacks because she too can predict the punches that come next?

Shutters and Shitters

The first signs I saw that Contrapoints had published her video on cancelling were a number of nonbinary people who I know on Twitter locking their accounts.
How does EoT do youtube? Subscriptions aren't necessarily endorsements. It's like an RSS feed. Does EoT wait for friends to watch and react videos before they watch them? Seems like a good way to always be primed a certain direction.
It's really amazing how different people can act vs. how they see themselves. The cancelling of Natalie on twitter is full of piss and bile, raw hateful reactions and lots of people who have not really read into what they're mad about. But Natalie publishes a video about being hurt by it, and they slam their shutters and nail 2x4's across their doors. EoT has told us they've done this in anticipation to attacks from Natalie's fans. The stans.
The timing EoT describes here indicates that none of these people wish to watch or listen to Natalie's video. They are riding on three claims:
  • There mere existence of Natalie's video is a directive from Natalie to attack nonbinary people.
  • Implying Contrapoints Stans will attack before they've actually watched the video.
  • Admitting that the content of Natalie's videos have nothing to do with her supposed influence?!
Dealing with this takes us on a journey. One I suspect contextualizes a whole lot of problems we're going to see in the rest of the video.

Gamification, cults of personality, stans, armies, and fault.

I need to present these videos:
Like it or not -- see it or not -- youtube and twitter go together in a shit sandwich that has been gamified for toxic consumption by bad players for a decade. Breadtube is a loose coalition of fans who have a common agenda in that they are sick of how the alt-right benefits so much from youtube's algorithm and does so much harm to the world.
The way things have been going, all an alt-right youtuber has to do is make a video where they make personal attacks on a vulnerable channel, and without even having to explicitly order it (though often enough they will), their fans will en masse attack the targeted channel and their friends with repetitive harassment until they're forced off youtube and twitter, even if they have to abuse the reporting system to do so.
That last video by Skeptical Squirrel, an imaginitive parody creation by Kevin Logan, illustrates that despite what they say, alt-right youtubers and other youtube personalities of the reactionary type are completely aware of what they are doing. They are not pretending to order fans around in that video. They are practicing, and celebrating that they can. And when they make followup videos in which they laugh and praise "anonymous" and "uncontrollable" mobs for the way they've attacked the targets of their videos (such as Sargon Of Akkad "laughing" at "weaponize autism"), they are telling their fans that their harassment is good. They are rewarding it.
For years now, whether you're aware of it or not, dear reader, this is how fans come into it on youtube. It is a tacitly constructed facet of youtube fanbases that it is rewarding and expected to harass the perceived enemies of the youtuber. That Skeptical Squirrel video is from January 2017, about harassment Jeff Holiday and Bearing had been consistently ramping up against Kristi Winters for a year and beyond.
People have been saying that Natalie has been instigating harassment campaigns with her videos. And so has EssenceOfThought. I am hereby telling you: We are at a point where one can hardly be a popular youtuber without a massive group of fans behaving this way on your behalf. It takes real work to stop it. But there are definitely ways to tell that a youtuber is not intentionally doing it, and ways to tell that a youtuber is definitely trying not to. I do not see any sign that Natalie wants her stans to do what they do, and I definitely see in her videos that she does not make targets out of anyone.
I say to you all, that if you want to accuse Natalie of instigating harassment campaigns, by necessity with the way EoT talks about Natalie in their videos, EoT would have to be even more guilty. And I do say, regardless of that conditional, that the way EoT speaks is irresponsibly having a boosting effect on the twitter screamers who are witch-hunting Natalie. At 1:20 of this video, EoT says that enby people on twitter are responding to "her presence," and this shit just ain't true. They're anticipating other people attacking them. Which they will do regardless. EoT is equivocating Natalie with these toxic twitters, taking away the twitters' agency and giving it all to Natalie. Beyond bogus.

What has Natalie even done?

The focus is first on her association with Buck Angel. So far, the only things Natalie has done so far are thus:
  1. Receive and repay compliments when she was injured.
  2. Repay further words of kindness with a cameo without vetting.
That's it.

Wildly Disproportionate Response

She has refused to vet after Opulence not only because she (like so many of y'all) doesn't want to see people she's befriended as baddies, but because even if she does, she will receive no forgiveness when she issues an apology, instead receiving a tidal wave of I-told-you-so's and more harassment. They've made it perfectly clear that if Natalie works with anybody even one flaw away from Sainthood, they're going to do it all over again. Let it here be said that if you still want Natalie to disassociate from Buck Angel (and I do), then you must make it so that it's not a lose-lose situation. You can't punish somebody for something, then punish them again for apologizing, and that's clearly what you want to do. You showed it when you went after Lindsay Ellis, Hbomberguy, Philosophytube, and others. Clearly she is unforgiveable in your eyes. It's bullshit. You're assholes that deserve no fucking sympathy when you act this way. You were kicking her and are kicking her when she's down, and Buck wasn't, and that shit matters when you're in that kind of situation as much as it does Natalie. Buck was being better than y'all in the moment. Fuck. Off.
So I have a real problem (one I should've seen from the beginning) when over and over, EoT makes these videos and starts statements, ad nauseum, with "What Natalie is doing is..." It gives the impression that Natalie is out there on social media doing a thousand things. She's not. She's done the 1 thing that she's being cancelled for, the unvetted cameo, and she has not touched her twitter in a couple months. But EoT is making things worse, which makes the title of this video highly ironic. An honest way of going about it would be something like, "So this mistake she's made..." -- and you do need to describe it as a mistake and not a deliberate attack -- "... has had these x, y, and z consequences." It's hyperbolic at best and demonizing at worst when it's "She's doing this" on repeat. That's increasing toxicity in the discourse.
You're not started the fires, EoT, but you've tossed a lot of dry cow patties around. And you can only do this so long before we say yes, you are responsible for the direction a wave goes one of these days soon.

Media illiteracy or just plain propaganda?

As for the people who are hiding from Contrapoints Stans, nonbinary or not, even without the stans around, you'd still have received some backlash. Claiming the pronouns video was attacking nonbinary?? If a hundred people responded with "What the fuck you dumb shit," then tough cookies, because that is ridiculous. That section of the video y'all attacked is exactly the same as the tweet she covers in Cancelling. It had nothing to with binary or nonbinary, had nothing to do with actual validity of trans identity, but instead was about strong vs weak argumentation aimed at cis people. Have you have at some point in your life been discussing politics or scientific ignorance and had somebody bring up, "Well, it seems like this kind of argument doesn't work very well. But when you tell them this thing that way, they start to get it faster." That's what was going on in the video and the twitter conversation.
And then your opinions somehow transformed into thinking that same section of the video was truscum. As if many of you have decided that anything problematic towards nonbinary people is the same as truscum ideology. Sheer nonsense. It's the other way around. All truscum are anti-enby. But not all anti-enby are truscum. There was nothing about transmedicalism in that video no matter how you look at it.
The worst thing the Pronouns video did was not tackle the case of enby perspective. In fact, Natalie went out of her way to make sure people do not confuse the experience she's illustrating as applying to nonbinary folk, by including the modifier, "In a binary world." That's not an attack on enbies. And if she even tried to cover an enby perspective, it's likely you'd attack her for that, too. Lose-lose. That's not valid criticism, and no reason to initiate cancellation. Pro-tip: if everything your enemy can say is wrong, then you too also cannot be right. When everything is evidence of your claim (Opulent Girl Bad!), then nothing is.
As for The Aesthetic, Justine did not win the debate. Just because she got to have a long winded endcap does not mean she was indended as the winner. There's just about nothing to indicate that. Justine's position just needed a lot more words to convey. You may be used to upvoting and reposting videos where the protagonist "wins" a debate by having a long Final Attack on the antagonist that makes them sit down in shame. But you should be able to tell from Natalie's videos and tweets alike that she doesn't operate that way. You need to up your media competence, and ditch the prejudice against Natalie that has to exist to even make the erroneous leap in interpretation that you made.
So why would Natalie do anything different in this current situation? The same people who are attacking her for associating with Buck Angel are also the ones witch-hunting her based off of lies about her videos. I think you can see how one can easily begin to think that some of the claims of emotional injury caused by her videos are falsified.
And don't think I'm saying Contrapoints stans aren't a problem. They are. The people who hate enbies have swarmed to this bucket of chum fore sure. Some of them are attacking me because I want honest depictions of flaws of EoT's videos and I'm not willing to unsee Buck Angel's shittery just because they think doing so would make Natalie feel better and provide us all with a new golden shower, er, golden egg, er, video. Oh yes. There is indeed too many Contrapoints fans who've decided that they need to whitewash Buck Angel so they can kiss Natalie's ass, and part of doing that is attacking Buck's critics, which has indeed become an attack on nonbinary people themselves. Because this is how parasocial relationships evolve when the detached personality fills a very real need on the side of the consumer. Especially on youtube, where as I've said fanships enter into the situation with assumptions about how detractors are to be treated. Then everybody plays Not My Nigel.
Natalie isn't instigating, and she's not a "force of destruction." The force existed before her. If it wasn't Natalie, it'd be somebody else. It'd be more people like Blaire White, Shoe0nHead, Jaclyn Glenn, etc. I mean how the fuck has Blaire White become background noise in this obsession with Natalie Wynn. Blaire's the one that makes series of truscummy attacks on people.
Imagine thinking Natalie is inspiring more of these attacks on enbies than Blaire white. I can't. But you're doing it. Yer doin it, peter! Yer doin it! Go get that dastardly Captain Wynn Hook.
But I don't want to attack nonbinary people for being nonbinary. I want to rebuke some people who're the real culprits of toxicity.

We are in a wicked hive of scum and villainy.

Like I said, EoT calls Natalie
"...a force of destruction, all intention aside."
First of all, when you say "what she's doing" all the time, you're pretty well implying there's lots of intent.
Second, gosh, does this line sound famliar. Where's the last place I heard it? Oh yeah. When Lily Orchard attacked the Pronouns video as anti-enby and pro-truscum: "Glass of Water: Natalie Whinging" And it also reminds me of something.
Natalie has been made into a villain. No, really, that's what's happened with EoT's progression and with their phrasing. Since I've already used Extra Credits once, I'll do it again. Does it seem a little off, maybe a little condescending to compare these video essays to video game design? Maybe. But it's not wrong. Expository and argumentitive essays require world-building, it's part of the job. Me, Natalie, EoT, everybody.
EoT can't seem to make up their mind about what kind of villain they perceive Natalie to be. They actually said "force of nature," but the thing about force-of-nature villains (FONV) is they are a symptom of the system. Attacking them directly and holding them personally responsible for groups of people harmed is short-term good at best, and tacitly endorsing the system at worst. It's pointless to do just play whack-a-mole with individual FONV. Example: Trump. So why focus so much on Natalie and not the online community that is splitting over her videos on interpretations of them that are clearly a combination of error and invention? Going after the boss baddie is what you do when you have a narrative villain. EoT seems to think knocking Natalie off the stage will lead naturally to some end. There's a hidden teleology to it. And I don't think it goes where EoT thinks it does.
What we're seeing here is a system of discourse in which a person can be scapegoated for cycles of back-and-forth attacks as if they caused it, when in reality those cycles are automatic. A key in an ignition got twisted, but it wasn't Natalie who dun it and it sure doesn't make sense to point at her every time you don't like that the motor is still running.

Half a millenium in Natalie's mind

20 years ago in a human lifespan is a long time. It's not really doing any good to harp on Natalie for thinking so. EoT makes Natalie's argument against 20-years-back research as some kind of vapid and malicious thing, but it's not. Natalie argues against doing 20 years into Buck's past based on three possible points, and you'll find some over the span of the video and her recent appearances in the media such as her interviews by NPR, and The Hill's Krystal Ball (both of which I am sure were published while EoT was in post-production or after publication); a couple we can think of ourselves:
  1. People change so much in 20 years it's like attacking a different person.
  2. 20 years ago she was a child, and she wouldn't want somebody to do this to her. It would feel like endorsing the same be done to her.
  3. If somebody has genuinely changed, repented -- even if only in private -- then it's like double jeopardy.
  4. The majority of the time when we see somebody digging that far into the past for dirt, it's done for malicious reasons and serves deceptive purposes. Given the strawmen used to attack Natalie, it doesn't seem like the request for her to do so is in good faith, nor what has been presented by those attacking herself. The pattern of bad faith attacks on Natalie do not lend to trusting that the accusations against Buck are in good faith; they seem as disproportionately powered by gossip as anything else in the 2 years of attacks on her. So, it seems prudent to refuse humoring them.
  5. If the victims don't want want to bring it up, it's an invasion of their privacy as well. We'd have to ask them directly because evidence is scant. Sometimes you have to respect when the victim doesn't want to re-live trauma.
In order to have a good case, one has to argue against each of these in turn. Which EoT does not. All we get is "I don't give a fuck." So allow me to present the arguments.
  1. Buck was in his 40's when this went down. 40 year olds are well established generally, and Buck had already established his identity long before, beginning medical procedures at 28, and soon felt his transition was complete. Read his wiki. Analyzing the pathology of habits requires going back long distances in time no matter how proportionally large that time leap seems. If a wrongdoing done recently is the same kind of wrongdoing done long ago, then it's relevant, long ago or not.
  2. It's quite a human thing to forget important differences in the lives of people we've recently befriended, especially when we're hurt. We can only offer our personal promise to not do that, and discourage others from doing so.
  3. Buck has ever faced real consequences or learned.
  4. We can only offer our personal promise we are not doing that, and discourage others.
  5. Fine then. There's more than enough readily-available material to cancel him anyways.
See how that's reasoned and compassionate argumentation? Much better than "I don't give a fuck."
You can't argue justice from "I don't give a fuck," EoT.
Notice though that there were counter arguments people probably are making that I refuse to.
I will not dismiss #2 on the basis of being an appeal to emotion, because it's not one. Bullies argue that their behavior is justified by implied permissions, and I will not enable it. I will not signal to them that it's justified or excusable.
Also...

Buck's past IRL victims have not consented and IT IS NOT OK

I will not argue that invading the privacy of and subjecting the victims to reliving their traumas is necessary for the greater good, that the needs of the many (other for future victims) outweigh the needs of the few (which happen to be the ones I want to re-traumatize for my vendetta). One of my early favorite feminists Amanda Marcotte once made this mistake and argued that police were correct to arrest a woman and force her to testify in a trial against her rapist. Yes, this did happen to a real rape victim. She recanted and changed her mind after fellow Feministing contributor Alexandra Brodsky wrote the following article. Bold emphasis is from me:
edit: actually I've decided to try and using reddit's 'code' markup to change the font/background/spacing of what I want to highlight. - nevermind on that, I forgot what it does to linebreaks.
PUNISHING SURVIVORS WON’T STOP SEXUAL VIOLENCE
Earlier this week, the Daily News reported that a Cowlitz County, Washington survivor of an alleged kidnapping and sexual assault, perpetrated by her ex-boyfriend and an accomplice, was jailed when she refused to cooperate with the prosecutors on the case. The story didn’t rise to the forefront of feminist news until feminist writer Amanda Marcotte wrote a defense of the decision, arguing that the County did what it had to do to stop future violence.
The Cowlitz County case is awful, and I disagree with Marcotte’s conclusion, but neither is really an aberration from how we view criminal justice and victimhood. Two worrying parts of Marcotte’s piece implicate our larger national conversation about sexual violence: we mistakenly think survivors are irrational girls rather than agents navigating impossible obstacles – but, simultaneously, that they have more responsibility to us than we have to them.
[heading:]Confused girls
Running through Marcotte’s piece is a common threads I hear in discussions of survivors of intimate partner: a belief that the abused are irrational. We see this assumption in the pathologization of “battered women’s syndrome,” where survivors’ self-defense is understood as a symptom of delusion. We see it in the patronizing explanations of “why they stay” that talk about women (always women) untethered from reality, tumbling without agency through cycles of abuse. We see it, too, in Marcotte’s characterization of the victim’s relationship with the defendant as a sort of blinder, distorting her view of the violence and so discouraging her from working with the prosecutors:
Research shows that a victim’s refusal to cooperate with a prosecution is more about her relationship to the abuser. In this particular case, the victim has a long-standing history with one of her attackers, which suggests that she probably doesn’t see this in the same way that someone kidnapped and assaulted by complete strangers would. While there are some interventions that can help reduce the problem of victims who recant out of these complex feelings, there’s no silver bullet of counseling that will get all victims to see things the way prosecutors want them to.
We don’t know if the survivor in this particular case was abused by her ex-boyfriend when they were together, so the analogy to research on intimate partner violence may not be relevant here at all. But the rhetoric is nonetheless eerily similar – and similarly destructive. Of course we hope victims leave and, if desired, take action to ensure their future safety and to hold their abusers accountable. But to pretend that survivors stay or refuse to cooperate with the police only because of “complex feelings” simultaneously ignores the very real restraints on their freedom and denies them the agency they’ve maintained.
Manipulation and emotional abuse can create undeniable psychological barriers to leaving or seeking help. These obstacles are no less real because they are not tangible; though they are complex and they are intimately felt, Marcotte’s characterization of these burdens as “complex feelings” belies their nearly physical weight. But we also must recognize the undeniable material barriers survivors face. For example, abuse often renders survivors financially dependent on their abusers (we can’t know if the survivor was dependent on he boyfriend in this case, but we do know she is now homeless). And a trademark of relationship abuse is isolation – as a result of the abuse, survivors often don’t have friends or family to whom they feel they can turn for help. To make matters worse, abusers often charm those closest to the victim, so that those who do reach out for support or who pursue prosecution are often met with disbelief and anger from those they love. Tragically, in these situations, the decision to stay or to forgo legal intervention may be the result of an impossible, but by no means irrational, calculus. The options and risks are unjust, but the agent isn’t erased.
We urgently need to change that calculus. It is essential that we provide professional and community services to help victims of IPV leave abusive relationships. That work is so important precisely because the restraints on survivors are more than just “feelings” — whether psychological or material barriers, they are very, very real.
So, too, are the reasons why most survivors don’t trust the criminal justice system to help them out. As I’ve written about previously, those who report to the police are more likely to find insensitivity or harassment than a conviction: is it really such a shocker that victims don’t want to cooperate with a system willing to lock them up, to criminalize their survival? Plus, while I definitely know some survivors comfortable with the prison system, others see incarceration as just another iteration of the violence they work to end.
Maybe victims don’t “see things the way prosecutors want them to” because they aren’t blind to the violence in their communities and in our criminal justice system that, yes, complicate the decision to cooperate with the prosecution of your ex. We should talk about what responses to interpersonal violence would look like in our feminist state, but that’s not the conversation we’re having here. Now we’re talking about how real people navigate real choices. And we can’t pretend real obstacles don’t exist.
[heading:]You owe us
Marcotte writes that “always erring on the side of victim sensitivity means putting some very bad men back out on the streets, where they will likely attack someone else.” I 100% agree that stopping perpetrators can help prevent future violence, which is one of the reasons I think it’s so important to provide survivors with safe, trauma-responsive accountability processes. The calculus, though, doesn’t have to boil down to us vs. her, our safety weighed against her comfort, because robust responses to violence centralize support for survivors as a collective responsibility that promotes the common good.
On the most basic level: I thought we’d been over this before: violence is caused by the violent, not short skirts or alcohol or confusion or, at least of all, victims. We usually talk about victim-blaming as putting the responsibility not to get raped on potential victims, rather than potential perpetrators. However, we see a similar logic in the insistence that it’s survivor’s job to stop violence against others, even at the expense of their own healing and safety. If they won’t make that sacrifice, we’re prepared to punish them. As much as the U.S. criminal justice system likes to pretend it can distinguish between imprisonment as punishment and imprisonment as logistical aid (see: pretrial detention), all time spent behind bars is punitive.
Also, even if you buy the carceral logic that prisons are our great hope, locking up survivors who report won’t help the courts catch rapists. As Melissa McEwan wrote at Shakesville, “If we’re really concerned about preventing future assaults, then we have to foremostly make it safe for multiple survivors to report—and publicly revictimizing one survivor in this way stands to discourage multiple victims from reporting. That is bigger than even this one rapist.” McEwan’s point rejects Marcotte’s belief that the interests of survivors and interests of the broader community are in tension: we are only safe as a whole when we support survivors. It is only then that victims can come forward and give us the chance to hold perpetrators accountable.
Stepping back, I resent the way this issue has been framed, both in media and private discussions, as one of individual vs. collective safety – as though survivors are unwilling to talk due to some deep selfishness – not only because its wrong but because it distracts us from the communal duty we’re so eager to ignore. Of course any feminist resistance to violence requires collective responsibility for the collective good. But our first question here should be what we, as a community, can do to support a survivor – not what the survivor should do to help us. What local structures can we set up to provide care to those who need it? How can we create safe opportunities for survivors to come forward? What community responses to harm can we build to hold abusers accountable in a country that has abandoned victims to a broken criminal justice system? Let’s talk about what we can do, rather than what any given survivor owes us.
Here’s the thing about violence: it’s hard to stop. That’s scary. I find it terrifying that we really, truly have not yet found ways to stop assault or abuse, or structures to respond to this violence when it occurs. I understand why many hold on to our belief in the criminal justice system when there aren’t alternatives onto which we can comfortably fall. I understand why we want to believe we live in a country where a victim would of course want to cooperate with prosecutors. I understand the temptation to count conviction rates and the clang of prison doors shutting closed like beads on a rosary, the comfort of pieces moving regularly, as they should, as though we’re going somewhere better. But when the methodical plodding ends with a survivor of violence in jail for choosing to deal with trauma on her own terms, perhaps its time we lose a little faith and rise up to do some good.
Now. Buck did not rape anybody. We are talking about the victims of invasion of privacy and public denegration. But this article says a lot.
I said in a youtube comment section that Buck deserves to get vetted "all the way back" because he considers himself a leader. And I'm ashamed to say that until I was writing those 5 arguments against digging up the dirty specifics on that divorce drama, I hadn't thought of this stuff either.
Nobody has asked Lana Wachowsky or her wife. They're not talking about it. And if they don't want to talk about it, then.. what? If you force that information out into the day, EoT, then you are punishing her. You are re-traumatizing them to fit your purpose.
Think about that. Look what this has become. The more you harp on Buck's marriage, the more likely somebody's going to violate that privacy and, dare I say, terrorize those two women with their personal lives, probably their doxx too, going public. Stochastic terrorism much? People have probably already tried to contact these people on social media. It's probably already started. They want to leave it behind and now y'all won't let them.
Can you really say you're doing this for the sake of victims?
Officially: the "investigation" into Buck Angel's divorce must stop right now.
submitted by Aerik to u/Aerik [link] [comments]

Victoria’s Secret: Have the Angels Fallen from Grace? (Interesting article on how the Epstein saga has affected the VS Brand)

Link to article
Link to archive of article: (I recommend archiving every article you come across. I usually use www.archive.is because I find it more user-friendly than The Wayback Machine.)
TEXT OF ARTICLE
Victoria’s Secret: Have the Angels Fallen from Grace?
by Dimitar Ganev | Oct 2, 2019

Victoria’s Secret, the largest lingerie retailer in the US, has been one of the most iconic apparel brands since the 1990s, not least because its sexually charged imaging set the industry’s standard for decades and exerted a strong influence on body image norms. But since 2015, the shares of its parent company L Brands have been dropping as sales keep taking hits from shifting consumer tastes, executive turnovers and emerging competition.
The Victoria’s Secret brand, built on skinny girls and scantily clad lingerie, is now largely perceived as inadequate for a time when consumers’ preferences have moved away from sex appeal and towards empowerment, inclusiveness and comfort. To many, the brand’s traditional marketing strategy, which bets on fashion shows where supermodels walk in stiletto heels and angel wings, seems tone-deaf in the era of #MeToo, which condemns all forms of objectifying women and imposing hard-to-achieve beauty standards.
The Victoria’s Secret Angels, once considered symbols of sexiness, have now started to alienate consumers: a recent study found that 68% of them like the brand “less than they used to” and 60% feel that Victoria’s Secret is “forced” or “fake.” Demand for its products has cooled as up-and-coming rival brands have become more attractive by promoting themselves through unedited images featuring women of more diverse shapes and sizes. The retail giant reported that it will close 53 stores in North America this year, citing a “decline in performance.”
The brand itself admitted that it relied on hypersexualised imaging for far too long and it needs to rethink its identity. At L Brands‘ recent investor day, John Mehas, head of Victoria’s Secret Lingerie, asserted that the company needs to evolve and to reconnect with consumers by launching new products, hiring new executives and using new marketing strategies.
An essential part of the narrative shift would be a more diverse group of models, improving the merchandise, replacing the brand’s marketing chief and “rethinking” its annual Victoria’s Secret fashion show, the only fashion show regularly broadcast around the world, whose ratings keep falling. The brand hinted that network television would no longer be the “right fit” for the event, which has been criticised for being focused on empowering the models who walk in it instead of trying to relate to consumers.
Inclusivity, Diversity and Epstein
Many specialised fashion publications and business outlets embarked on questioning how the once-beloved brand managed to garner such a bad reputation. Analysing the media conversation around Victoria’s Secret in the top-tier English language publications from October 2018 to September 2019, we found that the most often discussed topics were body inclusivity, the company’s ties with Jeffrey Epstein and gender diversity:
The strongest coverage drivers for both the “Body inclusivity” and “LGBTQ+ diversity” topics were the comments which 71-year-old chief marketing officer Ed Razek made in a 2018 interview with Vogue that quickly went viral. Razek, who reportedly has final say over who’s in the televised fashion show, said that he didn’t think Victoria’s Secret‘s fashion event should include transgender or plus-size models because it is supposed to be “a fantasy”.
“Shouldn’t you have transsexuals in the show? No. No, I don’t think we should,” he said. “Well, why not? Because the show is a fantasy. It’s a 42-minute entertainment special. That’s what it is. It is the only one of its kind in the world, and any other fashion brand in the world would take it in a minute, including the competitors that are carping at us. And they carp at us because we’re the leader.”
The remarks prompted a strong backlash from consumers. As with the most severe social media crises, Victoria’s Secret was embroiled in an outrage cascade — outbursts of moral judgment which start to drive the conversation around brands, their products and their corporate messages. In these cases, the virality of moral judgements is facilitated by the fact that most of the content on social media feeds and timelines is sorted according to its likelihood to generate engagement.
The fact that fashion brands in particular face a growing number of crises could be explained by the supposition that fashion items are often taken to be markers of cultural and social identity, and thus are susceptible to be perceived as controversial across social networks. For instance, designers often draw inspiration from other cultures’ traditions, which has recently given rise to accusations of “cultural appropriation”.
Razek later used the company’s Twitter account to issue a formal apology, saying that his remark “came across as insensitive.”
In August 2019, Razek retired just days after the lingerie brand hired its first openly transgender model for its teen label PINK: Brazilian Valentina Sampaio. The hire was generally welcomed by commentators – for instance, Kendall Jenner, daughter of trans icon Caitlyn Jenner, posted “celebrate trans women” to her 98 million Instagram followers.
Meanwhile, media monitoring organisation GLAAD, which deals with lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender issues, said Sampaio’s move comes as transgender people are becoming more visible in advertising. Examples of the trend include recent campaigns by Calvin Klein, Gap and H&M, while Playboy’s first transgender Playmate appeared in 2017.
Another strong coverage driver within the ‘Body inclusivity‘ topic was the protest outside Victoria’s Secret‘s store on Oxford Street in London, in which protesters stripped to their underwear and held signs demanding more diversity in fashion. To address such concerns, the latest investor meeting saw Victoria’s Secret deciding it will no longer rely on a small group of supermodels to promote its sexy lingerie, in a bid to use more inclusive marketing.
An example of this new strategy was an Instagram post of model Barbara Palvin, which was celebrated for being more body-inclusive, as social media users perceived Palvin to be curvier than the other supermodels. The post received over 780,000 likes in two days, generating 4.2 times the average number of likes, with users commenting that the model looks “normal” and “healthy”.
But the brand wasn’t that successful in managing another crisis: the widely publicised ties between L Brands founder Les Wexner and financier Jeffrey Epstein, an accused child sex trafficker who committed suicide in jail. Although Epstein didn’t actually work for Victoria’s Secret or L Brands, he had control over Wexner’s finances and personal life, according to reporting by The New York Times, and used his connections with Victoria’s Secret to facilitate his alleged crimes.
L Brands tried to distance itself from Epstein, saying it had cut ties with him nearly 12 years ago and disclosing that it had hired outside counsel to review the case. Wexner said: “Being taken advantage of by someone who was so sick, so cunning, so depraved, is something that I’m embarrassed that I was even close to. But that is in the past.”
In many media reports, the ‘Epstein ties‘ topic was closely related to the ‘Sexual harassment‘ topic, which was dominated by a petition urging Victoria’s Secret to take a stand against sexual harassment and violence. The open letter was addressed to Victoria’s Secret CEO John Mehas and signed by more than 100 models, many of whom have worked with the brand in the past, and also by the Model Alliance, an advocacy organisation in the fashion industry, and the Time’s Up movement against sexual harassment which was founded in response to the Weinstein effect and #MeToo.
The petition cited “numerous allegations of sexual assault, alleged rape, and sex trafficking of models and aspiring models”. Several of the company’s photographers have been accused of misconduct, on top of the links with Jeffrey Epstein. A Victoria’s Secret spokesperson said the firm has been in conversations with the Model Alliance “for some time”: “We are always concerned about the welfare of our models and want to continue to have dialogue with the Model Alliance and others to accomplish meaningful progress in the industry.”
Crisis mode
Ed Razek‘s aforementioned controversial comments regarding transgender and plus-size models made him the most often quoted spokesperson in the discussion around Victoria’s Secret:
Razek’s dominance in the conversation underlined the crisis of perception the brand suffers: his remarks were taken by many media outlets as a sign that the brand is unwilling to adapt to the current sociocultural climate. Models who have previously worked with the brand and who had a relatively large share of voice in the media conversation were quick to criticise him. For example. Karlie Kloss and Lily Aldridge posted a photo reading “Trans and GNC [gender non-conforming] people are not a debate” to their Instagram stories.
Karlie Kloss was one of the most vocal critics: she recently told Vogue that she had decided to terminate her relationship with Victoria’s Secret because the image was not “truly reflective” of who she was and the “kind of message I want to send to young women around the world about what it means to be beautiful.” Model Tess Holliday was harsher, leaving a message to Razek on Twitter following his Vogue interview: “Who needs VS anyway? They never supported plus ladies & now they are trying to dis my trans sisters? Hell nah. Kiss my fat ass, [Victoria’s Secret].”
The majority of media reports on Razek’s retirement announcement cited these remarks as one of the key points in his career and highlighted that he was one of the main figures in the highly sexualised beauty ideal put forth by the brand. The crisis of perception was also emphasised by the fact that L Brands CEO Les Wexner, another major corporate spokesperson in the conversation, was quoted primarily in relation to the Epstein scandal.
However, some of the spokespeople portrayed Victoria’s Secret in a positive light. Adriana Lima, one of the best-known Angels, quit the label after two decades and 18 fashion shows with the brand, sharing the news on Instagram with a heartfelt caption: “Dear Victoria, Thank you for showing me the world, sharing your secrets, and most importantly not just giving me wings but teaching me to fly.”
And while she presented the brand positively, some media publications reminded their readers of a an interview she gave to Grazia in 2011 in which she outlined the physical challenges she went through in order to be in shape, especially after her pregnancy.
Angel Behati Prinsloo tried to defend the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show against the criticism for its lack of transgender models and diverse body types. In an interview with Elle, she explained what the show stands for: ‘There’s a lot of talk about everything but I think people need to also understand that it’s a show. It’s not saying negative or positive about any body type, it’s ‘this is who they are’.”
In the meantime, Barbara Palvin was named as a Victoria’s Secret Angel after the successful Instagram post which customers perceived to be more body-inclusive. She announced the news to fans also via Instagram and her hire was generally interpreted by the media as a sign that the label is finally starting to listen to its critics.
CEO John Mehas‘ comments about the brand’s marketing shift were met with similar enthusiasm, especially his plans to include messaging that responds to the #MeToo movement. But the most warmly welcomed move was the hire of Valentina Sampaio: although some publications suggested that the brand’s first openly transgender model came too late, most commentators said that the retailer has finally moved in the right direction.
Lingerie wars
While Victoria’s Secret is caught up in a fierce discussion, L Brands‘ other flagship label, Bath & Body Works, a personal-goods retailer, continues to report strong earnings, supporting its struggling parent. Many reports on Victoria’s Secret‘s controversial reputation outlined this development, making Bath & Body Works the most frequently mentioned brand in the conversation:
While L Brands is firmly focused on the Victoria’s Secret turnaround story, Bath & Body Work is perceived as staying relevant with updated stores and new product tests, maintaining a wholesome image as “America’s sweetheart of beauty brands.” Its loyal core consumer base of millennial women is boosted by fan blogs and YouTube accounts dedicated to sharing new products. The brand also plans to ramp up volume by having a digital makeover for the first time in India.
Investors have even started pressuring L Brands to make Bath & Body Works a standalone company which would not be associated with Victoria’s Secret. Hedge fund Barington Capital, whose CEO James A. Mitarotonda was one of the few corporate spokespeople in the conversation, sent a lengthy letter to L Brands CEO Les Wexner arguing for a spinoff.
But after Bath & Body Works posted its first unchanged quarter of store traffic in five years during 2019’s second quarter, Jefferies analyst Randal Konik suggested that the best days for the bath and candle retailer may be over. Konik also said that the teen brand PINK is the next sore spot for L Brands, with sales falling by low double digits in the fourth quarter, as the label is “without fans and rudderless.”
ThirdLove, American Eagle Outfitters and Savage X Fenty were identified as the main competitors which have capitalised on Victoria’s Secret’s reputational struggles. ThirdLove, an online bra startup which was launched in 2013, was perceived as coming head to head with Victoria’s Secret as it focuses on inclusive sizing and marketing, which have helped its annual sales to grow at a rate of 180% for the past four years.
The brand opened its first pop-up store in New York in July 2019, putting itself in direct competition with Victoria’s Secret as the lingerie giant had a store less than a 10 minutes’ walk away. ThirdLove also joined the discussion around Razek’s comments, taking out a full-page ad in The New York Times, in which co-founder and co-CEO Heidi Zak said she was appalled when she read them: “I’ve read and re-read the interview at least 20 times, and each time I read it I’m even angrier. How in 2018 can the CMO of any public company — let alone one that claims to be for women — make such shocking, derogatory statements?”
When asked whether Victoria’s Secret was worried its customers might now be looking for something different, Razek mentioned ThirdLove: “We’re nobody’s ThirdLove,” Razek said. “We’re their first love. And Victoria’s Secret has been women’s first love from the beginning.”
American Eagle Outfitters was also viewed as one of the main companies to break Victoria’s Secret‘s grip on the apparel industry by offering fitting bras and using messaging which pitches inclusiveness and comfort over sex appeal. Its activewear and lingerie brand Aerie has built an image of an “anti-Victoria’s Secret” label with untouched ads featuring models of all shapes and sizes. Kyle Andrew, American Eagle’s CMO, said the company’s success is due to its willingness to experiment and find ways to better listen to its teen customer base.
Rihanna’s Savage X Fenty recent show, streamed on Amazon Prime, has been making headlines everywhere, with commentators saying it was everything that Victoria’s Secret’s annual runway show wishes it could be by featuring models of all shapes, sizes, and ethnic backgrounds, with a clear focus on body inclusivity and acceptance.
Meanwhile, retail corporation Target also tried to capitalise on Victoria’s Secret’s struggles with a strategy similar to ThirdLove, American Eagle Outfitters and Savage X Fenty: it launched a new bra and underwear brand called Auden with a campaign featuring women “in all different shapes and sizes.”
Nike was mentioned as one of the brands which have gotten ahead of the curve with their socially-conscious marketing efforts featuring ex-NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who had participated in racial justice demonstrations during national anthem ceremonies. Fast-fashion brand H&M got involved in the discussion for selling a $199 bra similar to Victoria’s Secret’s $1 million Fantasy Bra as part of its collaboration with Moschino.
Victoria’s Secret‘s reputational woos come at a time when the fashion and apparel industries occupy a central place in the extensively covered #MeToo movement and play a major role in ongoing media discussions around gender and identity. Since such issues naturally polarise consumers, brands which are dealing with products directly related to them are regularly caught up in fierce debates.
The growing importance of the debates around gender in the fashion industry has also been highlighted in the accelerating gender-neutral trend. The latest seasons have seen luxury brands like Gucci, Saint Laurent and Haider Ackerman combining menswear and womenswear runway shows, Others, such as Proenza Schouler and Rodarte, have started showing women’s pre-collections or women’s ready-to-wear during the back-to-back menswear and couture calendar. Meanwhile, fast-fashion labels such as Zara started releasing ungendered collections with models of both sexes dressed in the same clothes.
There are also a growing number of new brands like the Phluid Project, Agender and Rebrand which are built around the concept of non-binary dressing. Beyond fashion houses, the trend has also been recently reinforced by the Council of Fashion Designers of America (CFDA), which added a unisex/non-binary option for New York Fashion Week. Spokespeople for the CFDA explained that this decision came as a response to “a growing number of designers whose collections are not delineated by gender”, which “reflects the cultural momentum.”
submitted by ALiddleBiddle to Epstein [link] [comments]

Don't fall for One Step Ahead scam review! Learn the TRUTH here

Is One Step Ahead a scam or real? Learn the TRUTH here
Name: One Step Ahead
Niche: Binary Options
Website:
**[>>You can visit our website for our full review here<<] (www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/one-step-ahead.html)
Is One Step Ahead a scam or real?
For this Binary Options Review Panther Reddit review of One Step Ahead scam and whether or not One Step Ahead review is a scam or not I will focus on the red flags of One Step Ahead scam review and why you should avoid One Step Ahead scam review.
There are many Binary Option software on the market that would be more acceptable than One Step Ahead Binary Options.
[>>For my Binary Option Software Top Picks List, click here.<<] (www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/top-binary-option-software-picks.html)
Is One Step Ahead a scam or real?
One Step Ahead software scam has the Red Flags of a Binary Option scam that shares many traits with other Binary Option scams all over the market.
Below I will cover the bullet points as to why One Step Ahead is a scam and should be avoided:
There are no trading simulations with the One Step Ahead scam review promotion video that proves the One Step Ahead scam software actually works
As far as I have seen, I have yet see any trading simulations with One Step Ahead scam review anywhere on the internet.
Even on the One Step Ahead scam review website, not a single person traded with the One Step Ahead scam software to test it. You are required to trust the One Step Ahead scam review presentation on its word and sign up with it, without any simulation of the One Step Ahead software to engage you into signing up with it.
In a time full of Binary Option scams, I don't recommend just taking the word of someone who is paid to give you their word that the One Step Ahead scam review software actually works. Thats just foolish.
It's difficult to gauge the authenticity of a Binary Option software if no one has even tried it, or has been successful with the One Step Ahead scam review software in general.
One Step Ahead scam review has yet to prove it can make anyone money with Binary Option Trading
As stated above, there is no proof that One Step Ahead scam review actually works before you try it. Normally on youtube and other social mediums, there are people who discuss or do videos of their Binary Option trading and whether or not it is actually good.
With One Step Ahead scam review, I haven't seen any sign of that, just negative reviews of people who have buyers remorse with One Step Ahead scam review.
Generally I would recommend a Binary Option software if it has an overwhelming amount of positive reviews, and I thoroughly enjoy using it personally, however that is not the case with One Step Ahead scam review.
Too many negative reviews of One Step Ahead bot to take One Step Ahead scam review seriously as a professional Binary Option software to sign up with
As of right now, there are more One Step Ahead scam reviews than positive reviews. That is a bad sign with a Binary Option software, and I highly recommend
Many people are complaining and are thoroughly not interested with One Step Ahead scam review. For that reason, with good conscience, I cannot recommend One Step Ahead scam review.
One Step Ahead scam review is run by paid actors to promote it
Finally, the people who present the One Step Ahead scam review are paid actors who push the product with a faulty algorithm and promise way too much money from it. These are all deceptive tactics of a Binary Option scam that I have seen countless times over the years to the point it makes me sick.
I would expect the actual creators to come forward and sell their product, instead they paid someone $5 on the internet to push their product for them, and act like it will make everyone SO Much money.
For this reason, I cannot in good conscience recommend One Step Ahead scam review, because it is another red flag of a Binary Option scam I always tell people to avoid in my Binary Option Review Panther reviews.
There are many Binary Option software out there that would be a better Binary Option software to sign up with than One Step Ahead review. For the points I covered above, there is no other reason why anyone should consider signing up with One Step Ahead scam review.
If anyone has any questions about Binary Option software, or about One Step Ahead review,
[click here for my email] ([email protected]).
I love to answer emails personally.
Good luck trading
Julia Armstrong
Binary Options Review Panther
www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/iq-options.html
www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/auto-binary-signals.html
www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/binary-option-trading-signals.html
Tags: One Step Ahead scam, One Step Ahead Binary, is One Step Ahead compatable with Binary Option Robot?, One Step Ahead facebook, One Step Ahead wall street, One Step Ahead real, is One Step Ahead compatable with IQ Option?, One Step Ahead live, One Step Ahead twitter, One Step Ahead JP Morgan, One Step Ahead Binary Options, One Step Ahead trading, is One Step Ahead compatable with Porter Finance?, One Step Ahead tumblr, One Step Ahead stock market, One Step Ahead 2014 trading account, One Step Ahead trading, is One Step Ahead compatable with Banc De Binary?, One Step Ahead trading simulation, is One Step Ahead compatable with bloomex?, One Step Ahead One Step Ahead account broker, One Step Ahead pinterest, One Step Ahead George Soros,is One Step Ahead a scam or real?, is One Step Ahead real?, is One Step Ahead compatable with 24 Option.com?, is One Step Ahead too good to be true, One Step Ahead 2016 account, One Step Ahead trading bot, One Step Ahead myspace, is One Step Ahead compatable with HY Options?, One Step Ahead trading bot, One Step Ahead real scam, One Step Ahead software, is One Step Ahead compatable with Redwood? One Step Ahead reddit, One Step Ahead Binary Options account, One Step Ahead trading live, is One Step Ahead compatable with Option Fair?, One Step Ahead signals, One Step Ahead wordpress, One Step Ahead 2016, One Step Ahead preferred account, is One Step Ahead compatable with Finpari?, One Step Ahead free, One Step Ahead blogger, is One Step Ahead compatable with High Low?, is One Step Ahead free?, One Step Ahead Binary Options review, where can I download One Step Ahead free?, One Step Ahead imgur, One Step Ahead Binary Options scam review, One Step Ahead free income online with, One Step Ahead download for free, is One Step Ahead compatable with Top Option?, One Step Ahead Binary Options, One Step Ahead game stop, is One Step Ahead compatable with Goptions?, One Step Ahead bit coin, One Step Ahead binary options live trading account, is One Step Ahead compatable with Stockpair?, One Step Ahead 2015 account, One Step Ahead forex, is One Step Ahead compatable with Trade Thunder?, One Step Ahead 2015 trading account, One Step Ahead forex trading account with, One Step Ahead scam or real? is One Step Ahead compatable with Cherry Trade?, One Step Ahead Binary Options scam, One Step Ahead bitcoin free account with, One Step Ahead Binary Options trading bot, One Step Ahead is compatable with Boss Capital?, One Step Ahead 2015, One Step Ahead best of 2014, is One Step Ahead compatable with No1 Options?, One Step Ahead bot, One Step Ahead Binary Options bot, One Step Ahead youtube account, One Step Ahead scam review, One Step Ahead best of 2015, is One Step Ahead compatable with tradorax?, One Step Ahead Binary Options live, One Step Ahead facebook account, top 5 Binary Option software One Step Ahead , One Step Ahead gmail account, is One Step Ahead compatable with 10 trade?, One Step Ahead trading bot, One Step Ahead 2014 account, One Step Ahead Binary Options Broker live trading account live trading account, One Step Ahead broker, One Step Ahead is compatable with empire option?, One Step Ahead pinterest account, One Step Ahead live broker account, One Step Ahead yahoo account, is One Step Ahead compatable with binary brokerz?, One Step Ahead trading bot, One Step Ahead Binary Options scam or real? One Step Ahead Binary Options scam review, One Step Ahead free broker account, One Step Ahead account, is One Step Ahead compatable with BK Trading?, is One Step Ahead compatable with anyoption?, One Step Ahead scam review, is One Step Ahead compatable with UK Options?, One Step Ahead Binary free trading account, One Step Ahead Options live, One Step Ahead window 7, is One Step Ahead compatable with Optek.com?, One Step Ahead watchdog, One Step Ahead window 8, One Step Ahead 2014, is One Step Ahead compatable with Binary Tilt?, One Step Ahead 2014 trading account, One Step Ahead roy tribble, One Step Ahead windows 10, One Step Ahead brokers, is One Step Ahead compatable with Trade Rush?, One Step Ahead real, One Step Ahead roy tribble reviews, One Step Ahead proof, One Step Ahead the truth, Get One Step Ahead Review, One Step Ahead app, One Step Ahead information, One Step Ahead url, One Step Ahead website, One Step Ahead youtube video, One Step Ahead trading software, get One Step Ahead, article about One Step Ahead, One Step Ahead computer program, One Step Ahead the truth, One Step Ahead support, One Step Ahead support email address, One Step Ahead help desk, similar than One Step Ahead, better than One Step Ahead, One Step Ahead contact, One Step Ahead demo, One Step Ahead video tutorial, how does One Step Ahead work, is One Step Ahead system the best online isOne Step Ahead a scam, does One Step Ahead really work, does One Step Ahead actually work, One Step Ahead members area, One Step Ahead login page, One Step Ahead verification, One Step Ahead software reviews, One Step Ahead no fake review, One Step Ahead Live Broadcast, is One Step Ahead real, One Step Ahead forex trading, One Step Ahead binary options trading, One Step Ahead automated app, the One Step Ahead review, One Step Ahead signals, One Step Ahead mac os x, One Step Ahead broker sign up, One Step Ahead free download, reviews of One Step Ahead, One Step Ahead live results, One Step Ahead bonus, One Step Ahead honest review, One Step Ahead 2016, One Step Ahead 2015, is One Step Ahead worth the risk, One Step Ahead pc desktop, One Step Ahead Microsoft, is One Step Ahead compatable with Magnum Options?, One Step Ahead live account, One Step Ahead Binary Options Watchdog, One Step Ahead Playstation 4, One Step Ahead Binary Option broker, is One Step Ahead compatable with exbino.com?, One Step Ahead I saw it first,is One Step Ahead compatable with options xo?, One Step Ahead this, One Step Ahead real or fake, is One Step Ahead Method live trades real, One Step Ahead is this a scam, is One Step Ahead reliable?, One Step Ahead Review, One Step Ahead honest reviews, One Step Ahead is it a scam, One Step Ahead download software, One Step Ahead app review, is compatable with finacial trader?, One Step Ahead software download, One Step Ahead forum, One Step Ahead signals, One Step Ahead download page, One Step Ahead software demo somebody using it, One Step Ahead binary software, One Step Ahead binary options review, One Step Ahead members, is One Step Ahead compatable with option web?, One Step Ahead scam or legit,One Step Ahead comments, minimum deposit for One Step Ahead, One Step Ahead reviews, is One Step Ahead compatable with option rally? One Step Ahead binary today, One Step Ahead system pro review, One Step Ahead windows 7, One Step Ahead windows 8 and windows XP, One Step Ahead scam or real, login, has anybody out there made any money out of it with One Step Ahead?,
submitted by sienna_calloway to binaryreviewpanther [link] [comments]

Can you Trust Greg Insider Method? Learn the TRUTH here

Is Greg Insider Method a scam or real? Learn the TRUTH here
Name: Greg Insider Method
Niche: Binary Options
Type: Refundable loss Binary Option
Website:
You can visit our website for our full review here: www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/greg-insider-method.html
Is Greg Insider Method a scam or real?
In this Binary Option Review Panther Review of Greg Insider Method review, I will cover the points as to why Greg Insider Method is one of the better Binary Option software on the market, and why everyone should sign up with Greg Insider Method.
Looking for other Binary Option software you can trust? Visit the Binary Option Review Panther website for other Binary Option software recommended by many Binary Option traders, just like yourself.
>>>For my Binary Option Software Top Picks List, click here.<<<
Is Greg Insider Method a scam or real?
As of right now I cannot recommend Greg Insider Method scam review enough. Greg Insider Method is one of the many Binary Option software that I recommend on my Binary Option software top picks list which is full of many Binary Option software that so many countless Binary Option traders recommend.
With such overwhelming success of it's first release, Greg Insider Method has decided to be released again this year for others to enjoy another wave of Binary Option software profits through Greg Insider Method.
Personally, I did not catch the first wave of Greg Insider Method review and the overwhelming amount of success that others have reported from Greg Insider Method review, which is why I am writing a review on Greg Insider Method, so others do not miss out on this one.
Below I will cover the points as to how Greg Insider Method is different than the rest:
Experience you can trust with Greg Insider Method
Unlike other Binary Option software that has been created in someones garage overnight with a faulty algorithm, Greg Insider Method review is different and more professional. Greg Insider Method review has the quality that you can trust in a Binary Option software that actually works.
The people behind Greg Insider Method scam review have over 12 years worth of experience with trading and working with Forex before they decided to work with Greg Insider Method scam review. Forex is known for having a more fair trading experience than Binary Options, and I always recommend the quality of any Binary Option software from anyone who has dabbled with Forex.
Greg Insider Method is powered by a algorithm that actually works and has been field tested over and over again. There is nothing else that even compares with Greg Insider Method review when it comes to quality.
The $500,000 dollar guarantee
With Greg Insider Method review, there is one guarantee that they can promise their Binary Option traders that sign up: The $500,000 guarantee.
Yes, with Greg Insider Method review, there is a $500,000 cap with losing trades, meaning that no losses are on the Binary Option trader that signs up with Greg Insider Method review.
Greg Insider Method review has a contract with their Binary Option traders and Binary Option broker that Greg Insider Method review will absorb the losses of any Binary Option trader who signs up with Greg Insider Method review, meaning that the Binary Option trader can't lose with Greg Insider Method review. It's a win win situation.
Greg Insider Method review puts all their effort into making sure all of their Binary Option traders are happy and content and shouldn't have to worry about losses with Greg Insider Method review, like they would worry with other Binary Option Trader software on the market.
Greg Insider Method is highly recommended by countless other Binary Option traders, not just me
On the Greg Insider Method review website, you can see and read the countless testimonials for the Greg Insider Method review from the countless happy Binary Option Traders that have had success and their lives have changed thanks to the Greg Insider Method review software and the team of professionals behind it.
At this point I have yet to really see any unhappy Binary Option traders with Greg Insider Method review. The majority that have enjoyed Greg Insider Method review give the Greg Insider Method review team absolutely nothing but praise for all the work they have done.
Benefits of joining Greg Insider Method review
No download is necessary with the Greg Insider Method software
Payouts reported up to 90% with winning trades with Greg Insider Method! Wow!
Experience you can trust with Greg Insider Methods review
If anyone has any questions about Binary Option software, or about One Step Ahead review,
click here for my email>>> [email protected].
I love to answer emails personally.
Good luck trading
Julia Armstrong
Binary Options Review Panther
www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/iq-options.html www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/auto-binary-signals.html www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/binary-option-trading-signals.html
Tags: Greg Insider Method scam, Greg Insider Method Binary, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Binary Option Robot?, Greg Insider Method facebook, Greg Insider Method wall street, Greg Insider Method real, is Greg Insider Method compatable with IQ Option?, Greg Insider Method live, Greg Insider Method twitter, Greg Insider Method JP Morgan, Greg Insider Method Binary Options, Greg Insider Method trading, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Porter Finance?, Greg Insider Method tumblr, Greg Insider Method stock market, Greg Insider Method 2014 trading account, Greg Insider Method trading, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Banc De Binary?, Greg Insider Method trading simulation, is Greg Insider Method compatable with bloomex?, Greg Insider Method account broker, Greg Insider Method pinterest, Greg Insider Method George Soros,is Greg Insider Method a scam or real?, is Greg Insider Method real?, is Greg Insider Method compatable with 24 Option.com?, is Greg Insider Method too good to be true, Greg Insider Method 2016 account, Greg Insider Method trading bot, Greg Insider Method myspace, is Greg Insider Method compatable with HY Options?, Greg Insider Method trading bot, Greg Insider Method real scam, Greg Insider Method software, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Redwood? Greg Insider Method reddit, Greg Insider Method Binary Options account, Greg Insider Method trading live, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Option Fair?, Greg Insider Method signals, Greg Insider Method wordpress, Greg Insider Method 2016, Greg Insider Method preferred account, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Finpari?, Greg Insider Method free, Greg Insider Method blogger, is Greg Insider Method compatable with High Low?, is Greg Insider Method free?, Greg Insider Method Binary Options review, where can I download Greg Insider Method free?, Greg Insider Method imgur, Greg Insider Method Binary Options scam review, Greg Insider Method free income online with, Greg Insider Method download for free, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Top Option?, Greg Insider Method Binary Options, Greg Insider Method game stop, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Goptions?, Greg Insider Method bit coin, Greg Insider Method binary options live trading account, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Stockpair?, Greg Insider Method 2015 account, Greg Insider Method forex, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Trade Thunder?, Greg Insider Method 2015 trading account, Greg Insider Method forex trading account with, Greg Insider Method scam or real? is Greg Insider Method compatable with Cherry Trade?, Greg Insider Method Binary Options scam, Greg Insider Method bitcoin free account with, Greg Insider Method Binary Options trading bot, Greg Insider Method is compatable with Boss Capital?, Greg Insider Method 2015, Greg Insider Method best of 2014, is Greg Insider Method compatable with No1 Options?, Greg Insider Method bot, Greg Insider Method Binary Options bot, Greg Insider Method youtube account, Greg Insider Method scam review, Greg Insider Method best of 2015, is Greg Insider Method compatable with tradorax?, Greg Insider Method Binary Options live, Greg Insider Method facebook account, top 5 Binary Option softwareGreg Insider Method , Greg Insider Method gmail account, is Greg Insider Method compatable with 10 trade?, Greg Insider Method trading bot, Greg Insider Method 2014 account, Greg Insider Method Binary Options Broker live trading account live trading account, Greg Insider Method broker, Greg Insider Method is compatable with empire option?, Greg Insider Method pinterest account, Greg Insider Method live broker account, Greg Insider Method yahoo account, is Greg Insider Method compatable with binary brokerz?, Greg Insider Method trading bot, Greg Insider Method Binary Options scam or real? Greg Insider Method Binary Options scam review, Greg Insider Method free broker account, Greg Insider Method account, is Greg Insider Method compatable with BK Trading?, is Greg Insider Method compatable with anyoption?, Greg Insider Method scam review, is Greg Insider Method compatable with UK Options?, Greg Insider Method Binary free trading account, Greg Insider Method Options live, Greg Insider Method window 7, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Optek.com?, Greg Insider Method watchdog, Greg Insider Method window 8, Greg Insider Method 2014, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Binary Tilt?, Greg Insider Method 2014 trading account, Greg Insider Method roy tribble, Greg Insider Method windows 10, Greg Insider Method brokers, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Trade Rush?, Greg Insider Method real, Greg Insider Method roy tribble reviews, Greg Insider Method proof, Greg Insider Method the truth, Get Greg Insider Method Review, Greg Insider Method app, Greg Insider Method information, Greg Insider Method url, Greg Insider Method website, Greg Insider Method youtube video, Greg Insider Method trading software, get Greg Insider Method, article about Greg Insider Method, Greg Insider Method computer program, Greg Insider Method the truth, Greg Insider Method support, Greg Insider Method support email address, Greg Insider Method help desk, similar than Greg Insider Method, better than Greg Insider Method, OGreg Insider Method contact,Greg Insider Method demo, Greg Insider Method video tutorial, how does Greg Insider Method work, is Greg Insider Method system the best online is Greg Insider Method a scam, does Greg Insider Method really work, does Greg Insider Method actually work, Greg Insider Method members area, Greg Insider Method login page, Greg Insider Method verification, Greg Insider Method software reviews, Greg Insider Method no fake review, Greg Insider Method Live Broadcast, is Greg Insider Method real, Greg Insider Method forex trading, Greg Insider Method binary options trading, Greg Insider Method automated app, the Greg Insider Method review, Greg Insider Method signals, Greg Insider Method mac os x, Greg Insider Method broker sign up, Greg Insider Method free download, reviews of Greg Insider Method, Greg Insider Method live results, Greg Insider Method bonus, Greg Insider Method honest review, Greg Insider Method 2016, Greg Insider Method 2015, is Greg Insider Method worth the risk,Greg Insider Method pc desktop, Greg Insider Method Microsoft, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Magnum Options?, Greg Insider Method live account, Greg Insider Method Binary Options Watchdog, Greg Insider Method Playstation 4, Greg Insider Method Binary Option broker, is Greg Insider Method compatable with exbino.com?, Greg Insider Method I saw it first,is Greg Insider Method compatable with options xo?, Greg Insider Method this, Greg Insider Method real or fake, is Greg Insider Method live trades real, Greg Insider Method is this a scam, is Greg Insider Method reliable?, Greg Insider Method Review, Greg Insider Method honest reviews, Greg Insider Method is it a scam, Greg Insider Method download software, Greg Insider Method app review, is compatable with finacial trader?, Greg Insider Method software download, Greg Insider Method forum, Greg Insider Method signals, Greg Insider Method download page, Greg Insider Method software demo somebody using it, Greg Insider Method binary software, Greg Insider Method binary options review, Greg Insider Method members, is Greg Insider Method compatable with option web?, Greg Insider Method scam or legit,Greg Insider Method comments, minimum deposit for Greg Insider Method, Greg Insider Method reviews, is Greg Insider Method compatable with option rally? Greg Insider Method binary today, Greg Insider Method system pro review, Greg Insider Method windows 7, Greg Insider Method windows 8 and windows XP, Greg Insider Method scam or real, login, has anybody out there made any money out of it with Greg Insider Method?
submitted by sienna_calloway to binaryreviewpanther [link] [comments]

Is Star Wars Binary Bot a scam or real? Learn the TRUTH here

>>>Click here for the Star Wars Binary Option review to learn more about Star Wars Binary Option Bot review<<<
Is Star Wars Binary Bot a scam or real? Learn the TRUTH here with our Star Wars Binary Bot review here.
If anyone has any questions about Binary Option software, or about Star Wars Binary Bot review, you can emails us at: [email protected]
I love to answer emails personally!
Name Star Wars Binary Bot review
Niche: Binary Options
Type: Dark Pool
Website:
Is Star Wars Binary Bot review a scam or real?
This Binary Option Review Panther reddit review of the Star Wars Binary Bot review is dedicated to determining whether or not Star Wars Binary Bot review is a scam or real.
I generally will investigate a Binary Option software to determine if it has any Binary Option scams red flags, however from what I have seen and heard, Star Wars Binary Bot review is the real deal.
Many people are already signing up with Star Wars Binary Bot review and expect to make HUGE profits from the Star Wars Binary Bot review.
Star Wars Binary Bot review, thankfully is far from a Binary Option scam. Star Wars Binary Bot review is a Binary Option software hand made to perfection for many people to enjoy.
The Star Wars Binary Bot has a different algorithm that makes it one of the most profitable Binary Option software out there, I cannot recommend Star Wars Binary Bot review enough!
What is Star Wars Binary Bot scam review?
Star Wars Binary Bot scam review was released earlier this week and already many people are talking about Star Wars Binary Bot scam review.
So far a large amount of people are expecting big things from Star Wars Binary Bot scam review even though it's only been on the Binary Option market for less than a week.
The Star Wars Binary Bot scam review is one of the coolest Binary Option software on the market right now. Star Wars Binary Bot scam review is expected to have huge results once more people sign up with Star Wars Binary Bot scam review.
Who is behind Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options?
Allen Vader, of course. Although the creator calls himself Allen Vader, I do believe he made up his last name to show off just how much he loves Star Wars [It's apparent when looking at the Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options website], he is a Binary Option trader, just like everyone who uses Binary Option trading.
He is the end result of sticking with Binary Option trading. Allen Vader credits his success with Binary Option trading with sticking with it and not giving up, and eventually he hit it big, and then created Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options to complete his dream of Binary Options and Star Wars, rolled into one.
What makes Star Wars Binary Bot Binary different than the rest?
Star Wars Binary Bot Binary is a unique Binary Option software that has an even more unique algorithm behind Star Wars Binary Bot Binary.
Star Wars Binary Bot Binary is powered by the Dark Pool. What is the Dark Pool? Consider it a exclusive club of stock trading so to speak, that only a few people know about, and use. Famous Billionaires such as Warren Buffette and George Soros have made their billions trading in the Dark Pool.
It is unknown exactly how much is drawn into the Dark Pool of trading, but some estimate millions upon millions of dollars are left untouched, which is where Star Wars Binary Bot Binary comes in.
Star Wars Binary Bot Binary is specialized in tapping into those millions of dollars using the Star Wars Binary Bot formula that specializes in Dark Pool Binary Option trading.
The Dark Pool needs more traders in order to be successful. The more people are trading with Star Wars Binary Bot Binary, the more successful and profitable Star Wars Binary Bot Binary is.
Benefits of signing up with the Star Wars Binary Bot review website:
Access to the Dark Pool with Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Option review, unheard of in Binary Option trading until today
High pay outs, up to even 89% with winning trades with Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Option review, wow!
Conclusion with Star Wars Binary Bot review
I expect good things from Star Wars Binary Bot review, along with many others who are signing up for Star Wars Binary Bot review.
The Dark Pool is definetily looking like something that hopefully will be implemented into future Binary Option software for others to enjoy as well.
Good luck trading
Julia Armstrong
Binary Options Review Panther
You can watch our youtube video for Star Wars Binary Bot review here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-SmwrU30Hc
www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/iq-options.html
www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/auto-binary-signals.html
www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/binary-option-trading-signals.html
Tags: Star Wars Binary Bot scam, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Binary Option Robot?, Star Wars Binary Bot facebook, Star Wars Binary Bot wall street, Star Wars Binary Bot real, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with IQ Option?, Star Wars Binary Bot live, Star Wars Binary Bot twitter, Star Wars Binary Bot JP Morgan, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options, Star Wars Binary Bot trading, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Porter Finance?, Star Wars Binary Bot tumblr, Star Wars Binary Bot stock market, Star Wars Binary Bot 2014 trading account, Star Wars Binary Bot trading, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Banc De Binary?, Star Wars Binary Bot trading simulation, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with bloomex?,Star Wars Binary Bot account broker, Star Wars Binary Bot pinterest, Star Wars Binary Bot George Soros,is Star Wars Binary Bot a scam or real?, is Star Wars Binary Bot real?, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with 24 Option.com?, is Star Wars Binary Bot too good to be true, Star Wars Binary Bot 2016 account, Star Wars Binary Bot trading bot, Star Wars Binary Bot myspace, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with HY Options?, Star Wars Binary Bot trading bot, Star Wars Binary Bot real scam, Star Wars Binary Bot software, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Redwood? Star Wars Binary Bot reddit, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options account, Star Wars Binary Bot trading live, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Option Fair?, Star Wars Binary Bot signals, Star Wars Binary Bot wordpress, Star Wars Binary Bot 2016, Star Wars Binary Bot preferred account, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Finpari?, Star Wars Binary Bot free, Star Wars Binary Bot blogger, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with High Low?, is Star Wars Binary Bot free?, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options review, where can I download Star Wars Binary Bot free?,Star Wars Binary Bot imgur, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options scam review, Star Wars Binary Bot free income online with, Star Wars Binary Bot download for free, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Top Option?, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options, Star Wars Binary Bot game stop, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Goptions?, Star Wars Binary Bot bit coin, Star Wars Binary Bot binary options live trading account, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Stockpair?, Star Wars Binary Bot 2015 account, Star Wars Binary Bot forex, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Trade Thunder?, Star Wars Binary Bot 2015 trading account, Star Wars Binary Bot forex trading account with, Star Wars Binary Bot scam or real? is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Cherry Trade?, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options scam, Star Wars Binary Bot bitcoin free account with, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options trading bot, Star Wars Binary Bot is compatable with Boss Capital?, Star Wars Binary Bot 2015, Star Wars Binary Bot best of 2014, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with No1 Options?, Star Wars Binary Bot bot, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options bot, Star Wars Binary Bot youtube account, Star Wars Binary Bot scam review, Star Wars Binary Bot best of 2015, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with tradorax?, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options live, Star Wars Binary Bot facebook account, top 5 Binary Option software, Star Wars Binary Bot , Star Wars Binary Bot gmail account, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with 10 trade?, Star Wars Binary Bot trading bot, Star Wars Binary Bot 2014 account, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options Broker live trading account live trading account, Star Wars Binary Bot broker, Star Wars Binary Bot is compatable with empire option?, Star Wars Binary Bot pinterest account, Star Wars Binary Bot live broker account, Star Wars Binary Bot yahoo account, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with binary brokerz?, Star Wars Binary Bot trading bot, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options scam or real? Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options scam review, Star Wars Binary Bot free broker account, Star Wars Binary Bot account, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with BK Trading?, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with anyoption?, Star Wars Binary Bot scam review, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with UK Options?, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary free trading account, Star Wars Binary Bot Options live, Star Wars Binary Bot window 7, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Optek.com?, Star Wars Binary Bot watchdog, Star Wars Binary Bot window 8, Star Wars Binary Bot 2014, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Binary Tilt?, Star Wars Binary Bot 2014 trading account, Star Wars Binary Bot roy tribble, Star Wars Binary Bot windows 10, Star Wars Binary Bot brokers, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Trade Rush?, Star Wars Binary Bot real, Star Wars Binary Bot roy tribble reviews, Star Wars Binary Bot proof, Star Wars Binary Bot the truth, Star Wars Binary Bot Method Review, Star Wars Binary Bot app, Star Wars Binary Bot information, Star Wars Binary Bot url, Star Wars Binary Bot website, Star Wars Binary Bot youtube video, Star Wars Binary Bot trading software, get Star Wars Binary Bot, article about Star Wars Binary Bot, Star Wars Binary Bot computer program, Star Wars Binary Bot the truth, Star Wars Binary Bot support, Star Wars Binary Bot support email address, Star Wars Binary Bot help desk, similar than Star Wars Binary Bot, better than Star Wars Binary Bot, Star Wars Binary Bot contact, Star Wars Binary Bot demo, Star Wars Binary Bot video tutorial, how does Star Wars Binary Bot work, is Star Wars Binary Bot system the best online is Star Wars Binary Bot a scam, does Star Wars Binary Bot really work, does Star Wars Binary Bot actually work, Star Wars Binary Bot members area, Star Wars Binary Bot login page, Star Wars Binary Bot verification, Star Wars Binary Bot software reviews, Star Wars Binary Bot no fake review, Star Wars Binary Bot Live Broadcast, is Star Wars Binary Bot real, Star Wars Binary Bot forex trading, Star Wars Binary Bot binary options trading, Star Wars Binary Bot automated app, the Star Wars Binary Bot review, Star Wars Binary Bot signals, Star Wars Binary Bot mac os x, Star Wars Binary Bot broker sign up, Star Wars Binary Bot free download, reviews of Star Wars Binary Bot, Star Wars Binary Bot live results, Star Wars Binary Bot bonus, Star Wars Binary Bot honest review, Star Wars Binary Bot 2016, Star Wars Binary Bot 2015, is Star Wars Binary Bot worth the risk, Star Wars Binary Bot pc desktop, Star Wars Binary Bot Microsoft, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Magnum Options?, Star Wars Binary Bot live account, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options Watchdog, Star Wars Binary Bot Playstation 4, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Option broker, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with exbino.com?, Star Wars Binary Bot I saw it first,is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with options xo?, Star Wars Binary Bot this, Star Wars Binary Bot real or fake, is Star Wars Binary Bot live trades real, Star Wars Binary Bot is this a scam, is Star Wars Binary Bot reliable?, Star Wars Binary Bot Review, Star Wars Binary Bot honest reviews, Star Wars Binary Bot is it a scam, Star Wars Binary Bot download software, Star Wars Binary Bot app review, is compatable with finacial trader?, Star Wars Binary Bot software download, Star Wars Binary Bot forum, Star Wars Binary Bot signals, Star Wars Binary Bot download page, Star Wars Binary Bot software demo somebody using it, Star Wars Binary Bot binary software, Star Wars Binary Bot binary options review, Star Wars Binary Bot members, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with option web?, Star Wars Binary Bot scam or legit, Star Wars Binary Bot comments, minimum deposit for Star Wars Binary Bot, Star Wars Binary Bot reviews, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with option rally? Star Wars Binary Bot binary today, Star Wars Binary Bot system pro review, Star Wars Binary Bot windows 7, Star Wars Binary Bot windows 8 and windows XP, Star Wars Binary Bot scam or real, login, has anybody out there made any money out of it with Star Wars Binary Bot?,
submitted by sienna_calloway to binaryreviewpanther [link] [comments]

BOSS Indicator (Binary Options Signals Indicator for ... Boss Capital Review - Binary Options Scam? Or Real Live Trading Results? Binary Options Scam - YouTube This is how to trade Binary Options Full Time! - YouTube Trading Binary Options Boss Capital Binary Options Proven Working Trading Strategy Pierre Lagarde - YouTube High Low - Bianry Borker Platform Review

Boss Capital began the seemingly-impossible by becoming a member of the binary options brokerage marketplace of 2014 that is currently overloaded and overpopulated. But instead of trying to perform all types of stuff that has in no way already been done before, the group behind Boss Capital instead made the decision that the time had arrived for a much more refined method of binary options ... Boss Capital Binary Options Broker Review: Boss Capital binary options broker was first established in 2014. This broker is associated with the United Kingdom and is one of the most popular options for traders in Australia. Boss Capital conducts trades with traders from all over the world with the exception of the United States. This broker has built itself quite a reputation by providing ... Boss Capital Review – Archive. Boss Capital is one of the newest brokers on the market. This broker was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in Gibraltar. The broker is built on the Tech Financials platform and offers a decent trading package. This isn’t the best broker I have ever seen but it isn’t the worst either. They have a decent asset list, good options, adequate expiry and decent ... UPDATE (12.02.2017): We have found out that Boss Capital has shut down their operations. We recommend choosing one of our top binary option brokers instead: Try also Binary Option Robot if you are looking for automated binary trading. Old Review: Boss Capital is one of the most recently launched binary options brokers on the market. Review Boss Capital is a binary options broker domiciled in London, UK with satellite offices in close to 30 other countries across the globe. Boss Capital Options, launched in 2014, is a relative newcomer to the binary options industry and has already gained quite a following in this market. Boss Capital – Binary Options Broker. Company founded in 2014. Platform languages: English. Minimum deposit = $200. BossCapital offers Education for traders: video, binary options eBook. webinars Min Trade: 10$, Max Trade: 5000$. Boss Capital USA traders. Review of ” BossCapital Account types “: If you want to leave your BossCapital review please use tab “Comments” Open account ... Boss Capital was a binary options broker owned by Cheshire Capital Ltd., and located at: Cavell House Stannard Place, Crispins Rd, Norwich, NR3 1YE, United Kingdom. If you are trying to get your money back, read about complaints. Trading Platform Review. We see that they give traders the Tech Financials platform, which has more than 200 assets for trading! They offer binary options on ... Boss Capital Review. Deposit . $200. Payout. 85%. Trade Now! *RISK WARNING: YOUR CAPITAL MAY BE AT RISK. We have seen a sharp increase in the number of Binary Options trading sites that have become available online and offer their services to traders, and as such we have spent a lot of time taking a closer look at just what each of these sites have to offer their customers and have handpicked ... Boss Capital Binary Options Review. February 8, 2014. Launched in February 2014, it is extremely appealing visually. In addition, Boss Capital’s simplicity of use is likely to become the benchmark for other binary options trading sites that are in the planning stage and those that are just in the concept stage. There is no software to download in order to commence trading. Boss Capital ... BossCapital - Binary Options Broker Review 1. Key Features And Overview BossCapital Binary Options Broker 2. ... Offering a platform from Tech Financials, Boss Capital offers a comprehensive solution for binary options and should feature on any traders shortlist. Five different account types are offered with the minimum deposit requirement to start trading just $200. 3. Trading Platform www ...

[index] [17354] [3328] [27512] [606] [28181] [27118] [12449] [3697] [16249] [2076]

BOSS Indicator (Binary Options Signals Indicator for ...

boss capital, boss capital review,binary options system, options for profits, best daytrading charts, binary option signals, binary trading, forex options, binary options strategy, day trading ... How To Pay Off Your Mortgage Fast Using Velocity Banking How To Pay Off Your Mortgage In 5-7 Years - Duration: 41:34. Think Wealthy with Mike Adams 505,597 views 25 Year Old Millionaire Stock Trader Alex Temiz Q+A at SMB Capital Prop Firm In NYC ... Binary options Free strategy that works - from 100 to 21000 in a month - Duration: 56:21. Binary Options ... You can download the BOSS Indicator on http://bossindicator.com/ Have you ever been tempted to join binary options? Ever had a bad experience with binary options Recovery? Have you ever been scammed? How do you recover fro... This is how I have traded Binary for the past 3 years. Thank you for watching my videos, hit the subscribe button for more content. Check out our members res... This is a broker in the binary options trade. According to a boss capital review, the brokerage firm prides itself in concentrating on what matters. This makes their trading platform unique and ... Boss Capital D'Options Binaires L'Argent Avec D'Options Binaires - Duration: ... Binary Boom Review Binary Options Boom Review - Duration: 21 minutes. Pierre Lagarde. 5 years ago; 4,920 views ...

https://arab-binary-option.writenspeedverli.tk